A former secret serve agent who was present during the assassination of President John F Kennedy has range doubt on the " undivided bullet " hypothesis , sometimes mockingly called the " charming fastball " possibility , about 60 eld after the President ’s death .

On November 22 , 1963 , Paul Landis was standing on the run dining table of a car behind the President when the gunfire were provoke . Shortly afterwards , inwritten statements , Landis articulate that he had pick up two gunshot . Now he says that he heard a barrage of injection . It ’s not the only item that differs from his initial report .

consort to Landis , who spoke to theNew York Timesahead of an upcoming memoir , when he and fellow agent Clint Hill coaxed First Lady Jacqueline Kennedy out of the car at the hospital , he noticed two slug fragments – one of which he touched , but left in space – and another bullet stick in the leather seats behind whereKennedy had been seat .

Landis says he took this bullet and rank it in his pocket , with the purpose of giving it to a master . However , while in the hospital he take he placed the slug on the President ’s gurney so as to keep the evidence with his body .

A slug was found in the infirmary , but on the stretcher of Governor John B Connally Jr , who had been riding in the President ’s railroad car and was pip in multiple topographic point . Partly based on this and the three spent shell found on the sixth floor of the Good Book repository under the window , theWarren Commissioninto the assassination conclude that three shots had been go off .

One – dub the " undivided hummer " – go through Kennedy ’s neck and make Connally , one went into Kennedy ’s head , killing him , and one neglect , possiblyhitting a curband causing a fragment to hit a nearby citizen ’s cheek .

ⓘ IFLScience is not responsible for content share from outside situation .

The perpetration believed that the bullet must have become reposition from Connally in the hospital , explain why it was on the copestone . Landis thinks that maybe the stretchers were pushed together at some point , with the bullet being transferred next to Connally , and that the fastball he found in the elevator car had shallowly penetrated Kennedy ’s back , before coming bump .

masses have been skeptical of the " single bullet " possibility , not just those who believe there was a second shooter , so this title has raised some interest . A key question for doubter is why the bullet was so intact if it pass through both men and do pregnant injury . The bullet train – dictated to hail from the rifle used by Lee Harvey Oswald – only lose one or two grains of its original 160 or 161 grains in system of weights , allot to the New York Times .

The call that this bullet was move will be fuel for cabal theories , especially of a second crap-shooter . The Warren Commission mold that the single bullet must have caused the injuries to Kennedy and Connally , givenhow longit would take for Oswald to reload his rifle . However , footage shows Connally oppose to being buck a few seconds after Kennedy react to the first shot , puzzling the commission .

Landis told the New York Times that he had not want to come ahead with the information , for fear that he had done the wrong thing removing the bullet from the car . After theassassination , he suffered from post - traumatic stress disorder and did not want to talk about it . Then in 2014 , a fellow secret agent present at the assassination attempted to discourage Landis from speaking out . Always a believer that there was a lone hitman , now he says he is n’t so trusted .

“ At this point , I ’m set out to doubt myself , ” he told the New York Times . “ Now I begin to wonder . ”

While the narration is interesting , it does n’t necessarily follow that a second shooter was involved . It could mean , for example , that the slug thought to have overleap the car actually finish up inside it . As well as this , Landis ’s account has drawn doubt from others present at the view .

“ I conceive it raises concerns when the tale he is telling now , 60 year after the fact , is different than the statement he wrote in the day following the tragedy , " agent Clint Hill , who clamber onto Kennedy ’s car in an endeavour to economise him , told the New York Times . “ In my mind , there are serious inconsistencies in his various statement / tale . ”

Which , while not satisfying , will in all probability be enough to leave peoplearguingover the assassination for another 60 years to come .