Last week , as part of their month - farsighted celebration of Ursula K. LeGuin ’s Wizard of Earthsea , Manhattan ’s Center for Fiction gathered four fantasist , including Naomi Novik and Lev Grossman , to explain why phantasy matters .
Despite the panel ’s name , none of the utterer Lev Grossman ( The Magician King ) , Naomi Novik ( the Temeraire series ) , Kelly Link ( Pretty Monsters ) , and Felix Gilman ( The Half - Made World ) — at the Center for Fiction ’s “ Why Fantasy Matters ” really seemed to feel the literary genre need a defense . Instead , the conversation evolved into something more interesting : An examination of the way fancy can research what naturalism ca n’t .
To get things started , moderator Laura Miller ( generator of The Magician ’s Book : A Skeptic ’s Adventures in Narnia ) , tackling the panel ’s dependent matter from a unlike angle , asked why fantasy might not count . Lev Grossman cited the resistance he sometimes confront as Time ’s book critic , as he tried to incorporate more phantasy into the cartridge holder : citizenry often charge that these employment are escape , only a way for people to avoid realism . His response to that attitude :
“ In fact , the fantastical world that are depicted in these books are not illusion in a psychological sense , where you could have whatever you require . These are existence where the problems are very literal and you ’re encountering problems that are recognizable from the real existence in a metamorphose form . ” He add that Westeros , for example , is not a place you ’d want to get away into . Here Naomi Novik jumped in to add that , “ They can be used to give you distance from where you really are , from the matter that you want to err in there for your reviewer . ” That distance , Grossman concluded , can give you “ adhesive friction on tangible issues and real problems . ”
As the panel ’s nonmigratory surrealist , Kelly Link point to not just the symbolic possibilities , but how the tension between realness and fantasy can create a school text that ’s rich than something that ’s more aboveboard :
“ One of the things about working with fantasy or surreal or even satirical or crack - actual material is you are creating a narrative in which there is never just a exclusive reading . There ’s always another level moving around below the surface . You have these two levels , which are there also in realistic fabrication but are not quite as fluid . It ’s more potential to get a number of unlike meter reading into a study in which there are things which may be stand - ins for whatever the reader or the author want to put in there . ”
In fact , she values the bewilderment that fantasy offers : “ I do n’t like work where I interpret everything that ’s going on , where I opine , ‘ Yes , this is right , this all maps onto my experience . ’ I actually want something that stool me guess about thing in a different way . ”
Grossman chimed in :
“ When you ’re writing fantasy this tremendous thing take place , which is [ that ] everybody know about realness . We all do it what would really happen . Then you ’re playing with reality . You ’re breaking its rules . So there ’s this marvellous sense in which you are harmonizing with realism . Everybody knows the reality and then you ’re doing a kind of tonal pattern melody above world . ”
A conversation about earth - edifice turn into a lively discussion of how the substance of fantasy tropes have shifted over meter . Grossman said :
“ I think a caboodle about the fact that , for most of the history of literature that we know about , most literature was fantasy . Up through Shakespeare , it was not look askance upon to have witch and magic and spirits in your clobber . The more time I spend reading and writing fantasy , the more perverse it seems to me that fiction has to guess to act like the real world and obey the law of thermodynamics . ”
Novik , on the other handwriting , had an immediate buffet - point , which is that what we now consider mere folklore was , at the time , taken as literal truth : “ At the time , though , they consider hag were real . correct ? So you could say Shakespeare was attempt to drop a line realistically . ”
Grossman yield she was right — but tot up perhaps the most interesting remark of the whole talk , which is that he chance himself asking , “ Why does realism matter ? ”
Felix Gilman offered another take :
“ There ’s something square and emotionally worthful about something which is deliberately not intellectual , not fully understood . Which does n’t necessarily have to fit into the tropes of the phantasy music genre , but the fantasy genre is a class of cleave a finger up at completely rational perspective of the reality . ”
Ultimately , Novik bring the control panel full rope , explaining why she reads almost only phantasy at this point and suggest that fantasy ’s not - realness make , quite only , for a more piquant narrative :
“ The key for me is a sense of marvel , a sense something that I do n’t expect might happen at any moment , a signified that I have n’t been recite all the rule of the universe that I ’m in and I ’m getting to find them and that allows me to plight with the text edition . ”
Image : Mavamaramis / Flickr
This clause originally misstate the venire ’s moderator as Joan Walsh . It has been corrected .
FantasyNaomi Novik
Daily Newsletter
Get the best technical school , science , and culture news in your inbox day by day .
News from the future , delivered to your present tense .
You May Also Like
