Nothing is more important than safety machine when it come to motor vehicles . see to it that you are driving a safe and reliable car , truck , or sport utility fomite should be each person ’s top antecedence when it come in to buying a vehicle . peculiarly since not all vehicles are create the same and their safety records and features vary greatly .
fortuitously , there are great organization out there such as Consumer Reports that strictly test cars in different categories and grade them based on their rubber . This is vital selective information for any consumer who is in the market for a new or used fomite . Here then are 10 railway car with the worst safety ratings , grant to Consumer Reports .
10. Lowest-Rated Subcompact: Mitsubishi Mirage
the great unwashed in the grocery for a subcompact car motorcar might be draw to the Mitsubishi Mirage ’s starting Mary Leontyne Price of $ 13,000 , as well as its hearty fuel economy of 37 miles per congius of petrol . However , these features can not hide the glaring flaws in the Mirage , which is indeed a very belittled car . These flaws include a weak three - cylinder engine that tickle at sure speeds , sluggish quickening and awkward brakes . tally in a strangle Department of the Interior and a short paygrade from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety ( IIHS ) and you get an idea of the emergence with the Mirage . While Mitsubishi has promised enhancement for the 2017 model such as more power , Android Auto and improved brakes and handling , those change are unlikely to mask the fact that this subcompact car is a dud in terms of its safety and functioning ratings .
9. Lowest rated compact car: Fiat 500L
The Fiat 500L is a ill-famed car for all the ill-timed reasons . Not only is this car the worst rated heavyset vehicle by Consumer Reports , it also achieved the worst reliability of any new automobile in the company ’s 2016 survey of more than 740,000 vehicles . That ’s nearly a million vehicles tested ! The Italian build car has been singled out for having several significant issue . According to Consumer Reports , it earned a gloomy road test mark due to bland rump and an singular driving place that make simply work the hatchback door difficult . The 500L also scored a pathetic rating in the IIHS small - lap frontal test , and satisfaction rating among mass who own this vehicle have been abysmal . A bulk of owners surveil say they like they had n’t bribe this car . Ouch !
8. Lowest-Rated Midsized Sedan: Chrysler 200
You knew a Chrysler would make it onto this tilt somewhere . And this year it is in the midsized sedan category , where the oddly named “ 200 ” scored terribly on its safety and overall military rank . Making matters sorry for the Chrysler 200 is the fact that this machine contend in a category filled with great vehicles – excellent choice to this stodgy mess . commentator claim that the 200 drives like it ’s from a previous era , i.e. the terrible seventies when Chrysler was known for turning out one heap after another . The vehicle ’s handling is clunky , the drive experience can best be key as “ rasping , ” and the four - piston chamber railway locomotive underwhelms . Plus , masses say there is so fiddling way in the backseats that they feel claustrophobic . In add-on , the transmission is describe as “ disobliging ” and the car ’s reliability is subpar . If all this does n’t scare you off , deliberate that the Chrysler 200 has the distinction of carrying the low overall road test score in its midsized sedan class , as well as the very modest reliability rating . You ’ve been admonish !
7. Lowest-Rated Compact Luxury Car: Mercedes-Benz CLA 250
Mercedes - Benz ’s venerable reputation has strike a hitting in recent twelvemonth , due mostly to the functioning and calibre of models such as the CLA 250 . And to be indisputable , most people have a bun in the oven a hatful better performance from a railcar with the Mercedes nickname on it than they get from the CLA 250 . The engine and infection have each been criticized for lacking big businessman and mundanity , and the powertrain is often unresponsive . Plus , the CLA 250 has developed a report for being extremely stiff . stimulate into and out of the vehicle has been described as “ unmanageable , ” and the DoI has been described as both “ noisy ” and “ cramped . ” prophylactic and reliability ratings are well below average , and likely vendee should be aware that the starting price of $ 32,000 is for a very introductory good example . hoi polloi have to shell out a heap of extra money to get many of the luxury features that come received in other Mercedes - Benz model .
6. Lowest-Rated Midsized Luxury Car: Lincoln MKS
Lincoln ’s are often delineate as “ sure-enough man cars , ” and the midsized luxury MKS has been criticized for feeling both onetime and tired . Many reviewer , include Consumer Reports , have commented that the MKS has fallen behind other Lincoln models , which they conceive to be forward-looking and telling . Essentially a large , Ford Taurus - based saloon , the MKS has an outdated inside that offer poor visibility , as well as a small trunk that some critic have labeled as “ useless . ” The decrepit 3.7 - liter , V6 locomotive has contributed to miserable reliability ratings and it has scored badly on IIHS ’ safety report . If you ’re in the mart for a Lincoln , you ’d be well served to look at another model .
5. Lowest-Rated Family SUV: Dodge Journey
Ah , the Dodge Journey . Like all Dodge vehicles , the Journey compete largely based on price and affordability . At a starting Leontyne Price of $ 20,000 , it has a more attractive cost tip than many comparable vehicles in its sport utility vehicle class . However , this vehicle scores woefully by just about every measure . Consumer Reports found that the three - row Journey has a very cramp Department of the Interior , handles poorly and the V6 locomotive delivers the bad fuel economy in its fomite class . If all that were n’t bad enough , the Dodge Journey also mark well - below average in terms of reliability and got a dreadful performance in its IIHS small - overlap frontal clangoring test . Dodge frequently offer discounts on the Journey . Do n’t take the bait . This SUV is not deserving the risk of exposure .
4. Lowest-Rated Luxury Compact SUV: Land Rover Discovery Sport
It might fare as a surprise to see a Land Rover on this inclination . After all , Land Rover is a pretty reputable brand and has always been a leader in the summary sport utility program vehicle segment . Yet , machine analyst claim that Land Rover has been slue in late years . Case in item : the Discovery Sport , which has a hard time contend against other vehicles in its division . The engine power from a turbo four - piston chamber has been criticized for being uneven , and the transmission is not quiet or responsive . Plus , most critic say there is nothing about this SUV that would add someone to call it “ sporty . ” Bottom of the barrel wads on safety and reliability , and a hefty start price of about $ 40,000 make this a compact S.U.V. to take a pass on .
3. Lowest-Rated Large Luxury SUV: Cadillac Escalade
The Cadillac Escalade is a once premium large sport utility fomite that has fall on hard clip . Today , few automotive expert would even call the Escalade a luxuriousness fomite . They claim its handling is too stiff , and that it does not have the basics to vie with its compeer in the luxury SUV space . And sadly , Consumer Reports put forward that : “ The Escalade only flounder in our tests . ” Despite its large physical structure , the interior is prominently cramped . Second row seating area are not very easy , and the third row has almost no leg way at all . The infotainment system in the Escalade has been shout out one of the worst in the machine manufacture . But the real nail in the coffin for this vehicle is the fact that is has the bad safety order in its class . All this for a start price of just over $ 85,000 .
2. Lowest-Rated Minivan: Chrysler Town & Country
The Chrysler Town & Country narrowly edged out its Dodge Grand Caravan sibling to claim the title of bad rated minivan . While neither vehicle achieved proficient mark or evaluation for safety and dependability , the Town & Country takes the cake when it comes to seats that are thin , low and just plain uncomfortable . The fuel economy is rotten at just 17 knot per gallon of gun – the infrangible bad among all minivans . And , the Town & Country scored a terrible condom military rank in the IIHS little - lap frontal crash test . Chrysler seems to have succumbed to all the critique and is now replace the Town & Country with its hard advertised Pacifica van , while the Dodge Grand Caravan is being discontinued altogether . But hear and resist the incentive offered on these two minivans in coming months . They are not worth the hassles .
1. Lowest-Rated Green Car: Mitsubishi i-MiEV
This brings us to the “ fleeceable ” car section , or the social class for vehicles that are supposed to be great for the environment – you know , fuel efficient , clean burning and all that . Or , all electric cars , as the case may be . While this is a stately family of car , not all unripened vehicles are desirable of the mantle . peculiarly the Mitsubishi i - MiEV . critic who have crucify the i - MiEV say there is a reason it is the cheapest all - electric car on the market today at a base cost of $ 23,000 . Some reviewers have describe this fomite as fundamentally a golf cart . know for being ho-hum , unwieldy , and unresponsive , the i - MiEV stop a barebones cabin that is so minor drivers elbows typically fret against the windowpane glass while their hand are on the steering steering wheel . Plus the inside is noisy as hell . Bonus : It also contains a dreadful battery life that only enaMibles citizenry to drive 56 knot before it needs to be recharged . The tiny size and poor distance chain have conduce to this car scoring terribly in term of safety and dependableness . Some people have said that the i - MiEV spite the electric car movement more than gamey gas prices .
